Monday, May 21, 2018

Sarah Haywood's "The Cactus"

Sarah Haywood was born in Birmingham. She studied Law at Kent University and Chester College of Law, then worked as a trainee solicitor in London.

After qualification, she moved to Liverpool, working first as a solicitor, then as an advice worker with Citizens Advice. She subsequently joined the Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman, where she investigated complaints about lawyers.

Haywood completed an Open University Creative Writing Course, followed by an MA in Creative Writing at Manchester Metropolitan University. She lives in Liverpool with her husband and two sons.

Here Haywood dreamcasts two versions of an adaptation of her debut novel, The Cactus:
I’ve been weighing up what would work best: a big-budget Hollywood adaptation of The Cactus, or a lower-budget British one. The book is set in the UK - in London and Birmingham - but it’s a universal story that could be transplanted almost anywhere. For this blog, I’ve plumped for a British adaptation, simply because it’s closer to my original vision, but I have my US cast lined up too, should Hollywood come knocking at my door.

The Cactus is a wryly humorous, character-driven story about recognisably flawed, quirky people in a familiar domestic setting. It concerns family relationships and secrets, and the things we do to protect ourselves. Mike Leigh, whose films blend humour and pathos, would have been perfect to direct, if it weren’t for the fact that his plots and characters are crafted through improvisation. Equally perfect would be Andrea Arnold, who has a wonderful talent for making ordinary lives seem extraordinary.

My novel is narrated in the first person through the eyes of Susan Green, a strong, feisty forty-five-year-old woman who believes she’s created the ideal life for herself. She never lets anyone get close to her, so she can never be hurt. The challenge for the actor who plays Susan will be to appear cool and detached whilst hinting at the character’s dry sense of humour and the messy emotions bubbling under the surface. I’d love to see what Maxine Peake, a brilliant British actor who’s equally at home with drama and comedy, would do with the role.

Susan’s younger brother, Edward, with whom she’s battling over their mother’s will, refuses to grow up. He’s never had a ‘proper’ job and dreams of being in a band. We don’t know whether he tricked their mother into favouring him in the will, and it’s unclear whether he’s quite as useless as Susan tells us. James McAvoy would do a great job of portraying this ambiguous character. Rob is Edward’s best friend. Susan thinks he’s a waste of space, just like her brother. Although Rob was rebellious when he was younger, and has his own skeletons in the cupboard, he’s now sorted out his life. Susan feels an inexplicable attraction to him but isn’t about to admit that, even to herself. She certainly doesn’t trust him. Tom Hiddleston is my choice to embody Rob’s long-limbed, easy-going and winning nature.

Aunt Sylvia is an eccentric woman who doesn’t see any bad in anyone (especially not in herself) and is endlessly upbeat and optimistic. She’s a little silly and self-obsessed, but her heart is in the right place; she loves her family and is fiercely loyal to them. Miranda Richardson is someone who can play comical characters whilst signalling their underlying vulnerability and neediness.

The father of Susan’s baby is Richard, a man with whom she had a relationship of convenience, and who is coolly charming and impeccably turned-out. Jude Law would make a great job of personifying him. Kate lives in the flat above Susan’s. At first, Kate is painfully shy, hiding behind her baby when forced to interact with adults. As she and Susan become closer, she begins to open up and engage with people as an equal. Carey Mulligan would be perfect to play someone initially full of self-doubt who, like Susan, blossoms. In fact, I like her so much in the role that I’ve cast her in the Hollywood adaptation of The Cactus too. And here it is:

Director: Greta Gerwig
Susan: Amy Adams
Edward: Jared Leto
Rob: Ethan Hawke
Richard: John Hamm
Aunt Sylvia: Jessica Lange
Kate: Carey Mulligan
Visit Sarah Haywood's website.

Writers Read: Sarah Haywood.

--Marshal Zeringue

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Jack Campbell's "Ascendant"

Jack Campbell” is the pen name of John G. Hemry, a retired naval officer who graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis before serving with the surface fleet and in a variety of other assignments. He is the New York Times bestselling author of The Lost Fleet series and The Lost Stars series, as well as the Stark’s War, Paul Sinclair, and Pillars of Reality series. He lives with his indomitable wife and three children in Maryland.

Here Campbell dreamcasts an adaptation of his new novel, Ascendant:
Who would I like to play the lead roles if Ascendant was turned into a movie?

That's a tough one. In part because some of the best actors for a certain role are ones I've already committed to roles if the later Lost Fleet series becomes movies. For example, Katee Sackhoff would be great as Mele Darcy the Marine, but I want Katee for the role of battle cruiser commander Tanya Desjani in the later books. Elena Anaya or Rosario Dawson could play Carmen Ochoa. Lochan Nakamura could be played by Jackie Chan. That's a bit against type, but I think Chan (in addition to being perhaps the greatest stunt actor of all time) is very good at playing the world-weary man who isn't quite ready to give up yet, and still wants to make a difference. Jackie Chan has the strength to play someone who doesn't think he's strong, but has more going for him that he himself believes. Tadanobu Asano also has the acting chops to play Lochan well. The most difficult one to cast would be Rob Geary, an everyman who has to face extraordinary challenges. A young James Stewart could have done him, or a young Tom Hanks or Morgan Freeman. Nowadays? Josh Hutcherson, maybe. Someone not too cocky or heroic seeming, but able to show how an "average" person can be rise to remarkable demands.
Visit Jack Campbell's website.

Writers Read: Jack Campbell.

--Marshal Zeringue

Thursday, May 17, 2018

Nick Oldham's "Bad Cops"

Nick Oldham was born in April 1956 in a house in the tiny village of Belthorn on the moors high above Blackburn, Lancashire.

After leaving college and spending a depressing year in a bank, he joined Lancashire Constabulary at the age of nineteen in 1975 and served in many operational postings around the county. Most of his service was spent in uniform, but the final ten years were spent as a trainer and a manager in police training. He retired in 2005 at the rank of inspector.

He lives with his partner, Belinda, on the outskirts of Preston.

Here Oldham shares a suggestion about who might play the lead in an adaptation of his new novel, Bad Cops:
With my first Henry Christie novel having been published some twenty-one years ago, the actors who I'd imagined in that role are probably a little bit long in the tooth now, so my ideas on that score have changed somewhat. That said, as a little anecdote, I did sell the TV rights (for about eight years) to a well-known production company in the 2000s for my novel Nightmare City. Needless to say, it was never made – however, I was privy to some of the names being suggested for the Christie role back then during production meetings, one of which was an emerging actor who went on to great fame and fortune playing James Bond (you'll just have to guess who that was!). However, the TV rights lapsed and it never happened, so I'm still in dreamland – and my current favourite for the Henry Christie role is Ioan Grufford, who's just about the right age and has impressed recently in a TV role and I know he'd be great in my lead role.
Follow Nick Oldham on Facebook and Twitter.

Writers Read: Nick Oldham.

The Page 69 Test: Bad Cops.

--Marshal Zeringue

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Daniel Czitrom's "New York Exposed"

Daniel Czitrom is Ford Foundation Professor of History at Mount Holyoke College, and the author of Media and the American Mind: From Morse to McLuhan. He was the history advisor on BBC America's production of Coppers.

Here Czitrom shares a scenario and dreamcast for a TV series adaptation of his new book, New York Exposed: The Gilded Age Police Scandal that Launched the Progressive Era:
New York Exposed tells the story of how one man’s determination to uncover and end police corruption in 1890s New York upends the city and shocks the nation. Rev. Charles H. Parkhurst’s moral crusade to clean up New York reveals in unprecedented, headline grabbing detail, the tight links between police, politicians and the underworld. The city’s vice economy—including prostitution, the saloon trade, gambling, counterfeiting and more—thrives on servicing and conning thousands of New Yorkers and out of town visitors. All of this is managed by the New York Police Department, whose captains rule their precincts like personal fiefdoms.

Parkhurst’s fiery sermon of February 14, 1892 triggers widespread criticism and infuriates the District Attorney, who brings the minister before a Grand Jury. Can he offer any specific evidence about crimes back up his corruption charges? He could not, and is roundly denounced as a fraud, a “sensationalist” preacher making wild accusations based on rumors.

Dr. Parkhurst, isolated and under withering attack, faces a moment of truth. Refusing to back down from his claims that police and city officials routinely colluded with criminals, he must figure out a way to gather empirical proof for his charges. He resolves to get it by making a personal tour of the city’s underworld. He is accompanied by 26 year old Charles Gardner, a seedy private detective with a checkered past, and a young wealthy parishioner. Disguised as an out-of-town rube, Parkhurst and his friends spend four nights visiting cheap whorehouses downtown, expensive brothels uptown, after hours saloons, and a homosexual bar. On March 13 he preached another sermon, drawing an overflow crowd at his Madison Square Presbyterian church. In place of the usual prayer books on his lectern he had two thick piles of neatly typed affidavits. He announces creation of the City Vigilance League and prepares to challenge both the police department and the power of Tammany Hall, the nation’s strongest political machine.

Parkhurst’s crusade and the ensuing investigation by the NY State Senate’s Lexow Committee bares the full panorama of New York on the verge of modernity. Witnesses from all walks of New York life—brothel keepers, prostitutes, businessmen, police officials, counterfeiters—reveal with shocking and unprecedented detail how the police managed Gotham’s lucrative vice economy. As a result, Tammany Hall, whose control of the city seems impregnable, goes down to defeat in 1894. Parkhurst’s campaign kickstarts the Progressive movement around the nation and Theodore Roosevelt becomes president of the NY Board of Police.

The city in the 1890s is America’s first metropolis, its financial hub, its media center, and the political stronghold of Tammany Hall Democrats; all this makes the story a national one. New York is also riven by deep class divisions made rawer by the disastrous economic depression of 1893, the worst in American history to that time. Moral crusades offer simplicity and clarity of purpose. But to many working class and immigrant New Yorkers “reform” smells of repressive moralism, furtive surveillance, and the policing of personal behavior. Achieving real and lasting reform in 1890s New York proves as difficult then as it is today. Several themes in this story resonate strongly now: police violence; vote fraud and vote suppression; women as a new political force; the immigrant struggle; the muckraking power of journalism; corruption in politics; evangelical religion in American politics.

I imagine Gary Oldman as playing Parkhurst. Not the scenery chewing, eternally yelling Winston Churchill, but the Oldman who played Rev. Arthur Dimmesdale in the 1995 movie of The Scarlet Letter. There he inhabited a minister torn between his public life and private passion. Parkhurst’s drama is a different one of course, but Oldman’s would no doubt find it and bring it to life. For Charles Gardner we’d need a younger actor with a cynical edge, such as Ben Foster or Miles Teller. There are very juicy roles as well in the two police brass, Thomas Byrnes (Tom Selleck), and the physically imposing Alexander “Clubber” Williams (Bradley Cooper), and Emma Goldman (Lena Dunham).
Learn more about New York Exposed at the Oxford University Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Monday, May 14, 2018

Stacey Filak's "The Queen Underneath"

Stacey Filak was born in a small town in Michigan, where she dreamed of hero's quests, epic battles, and publishing a book. At least a couple of things have come true. She lives in Kalamazoo, Michigan, with her husband and four children, and a menagerie of pop-culture named pets. She manages a veterinary clinic as her day job and aspires to someday write something that means as much to someone else as her childhood favorites mean to her.

Here Filak dreamcasts an adaptation of her new novel, The Queen Underneath:
The Queen Underneath takes place in the city-state of Yigris, the smallest of four nations on an island called The Four Winds. The population of Yigris is varied and diverse, and so would be the cast of a movie version of it.

To play Gemma, the fierce but feminine leader of Under, the home of thieves, assassins, pirates, and sex-workers, I would cast Frankie Adams. Ever since I first saw Ms. Adams on The Expanse T.V. show, she has been my ideal for this leading character. Her confidence, charisma, and presence – both physical and personality-wise – make her a perfect fit.

In the role of Tollan, the naïve and untested King of Above, I would love to see John Boyega. This young actor has already shown his ability to be both strong and funny, and I think he has the emotional range to really bring Tollan to life.

Playing Elam, a sex priest of Under and Gemma’s best friend, I would cast Dev Patel. Physically, he fits the description of Elam, and I’ve admired his acting chops for years. I also think that he would bring the maturity and emotional grounding to the cast that Elam brings to the book. While Gemma is at the center of the action, Elam is the heart of the book, and he is the link between the two worlds.

In the role of Devery, Gemma’s lover and a master assassin, I’d cast Jaime Bell. Not only does he have the right look – slender, wiry, and the perfect cold expression of distaste – he also has proven himself to be capable of filming some pretty graceful fight scenes, and has a biting wit, all of which any actor to play Devery would need.

While those are the four main characters, I couldn’t help but cast my three favorite supporting characters as well. In the role of Wince, Tollan’s wise-cracking best friend and constant companion, I would cast Jorge Lendeborg, Jr. Hot off his appearances in Spiderman: Homecoming and Love, Simon, this young actor has shown his range through both serious and hilarious scenes, and I really love the sense of kinship that he projected with his friends in both films.

As Lian, a maid from Under, I would cast Ruth Negga. The beautiful Negga would need to be aged with makeup, but I think she would bring a depth to the character, a hard-edge to a seemingly soft character that perfectly fits my vision of Lian.

And finally, in the role of Fin the Fish, I would cast Dave Bautista. A Balklander, Fin is a man that is said to be descended from sharks. Smooth-skinned, sharp-toothed, and huge, I’d love to see Bautista bring Fin to life. While he appears to be a vicious character, Fin has a softness to him that he only shows to those closest to him, and after seeing what Bautista has done with Drax the Destroyer, I think he would be a tremendous addition to the movie.

So while I doubt that I’ll ever have the opportunity, I’ve got the perfect cast all lined up in my mind. I’m just waiting for Hollywood to hand them the script.
Visit Stacey Filak's website.

The Page 69 Test: The Queen Underneath.

Writers Read: Stacey Filak.

--Marshal Zeringue

Saturday, May 12, 2018

Stephen McCauley's "My Ex-Life"

Stephen McCauley is the author of The Object of My Affection, True Enough, and Alternatives to Sex. Many of his books have been national bestsellers, and three have been made into feature films. The New York Times Book Review dubbed McCauley “the secret love child of Edith Wharton and Woody Allen”, and he was named a Chevalier in the Order of Arts and Letters by the French Ministry of Culture. His fiction, reviews, and articles have appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, Harper’s, Vogue, and many other publications. He currently serves as Co-Director of Creative Writing at Brandeis University.

Here McCauley shares some insight into casting the leads for an adaptation of his new novel, My Ex-Life:
I’ve had the very good fortune to have three of my seven novels made into movies. One here in the US—The Object of My Affection with Jennifer Aniston and Paul Rudd—and two others in France. In every case, the actors bore so little resemblance to the characters as I described them, it was hard for me to connect what was going on on screen with what I’d written. Not that I objected, just to say it confused me. Perhaps as a result of those experiences, I’m a little resistant to thinking of my characters in terms of actors. In the case of The Object of My Affection, the option was bought as soon as the book came out, and then it took eleven years to get it made. In that time, the producers kept changing who they wanted for the leads, depending on who had a hit movie or had won an award, not who resembled the characters I’d written. So using that logic, I’d say Frances McDormand for the female protagonist--she just won an Oscar and actually would be perfect--and Gary Oldman for the male lead. He just won an Oscar, too, and, come to think of it, also would be perfect. So maybe the producers knew what they were doing!
Visit Stephen McCauley's website.

Writers Read: Stephen McCauley.

The Page 69 Test: My Ex-Life.

--Marshal Zeringue

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Emily Ogden's "Credulity: A Cultural History of US Mesmerism"

Emily Ogden is assistant professor of English at the University of Virginia.

Here she dreamcasts an adaptation of her new book, Credulity: A Cultural History of US Mesmerism:
Like Americans in the present, Americans in the nineteenth century worried about fake news: they were surrounded with financial scheming, quackery, and shady politics. When I describe mesmerism, you’ll probably think it was part of the problem. Mesmerists claimed they could entrance people, control minds, and gift their subjects with clairvoyant powers. More quackery, right? But they took the US by storm: everyone wanted to mesmerize or be mesmerized. Why?

I think it’s because, even as mesmerists were accused of duping people, they tried to explain how duping worked. They said that the mesmeric trance was, essentially, a state of belief: their experiments could explain how and why people come to be credulous, or gullible. Their explanation wasn’t simple—nor was credulity itself.

My book, the movie has four lead actors: two male-female pairs whose relationships illustrate the strange turns belief can take. Both male characters become mesmerized by the women they thought they could wrap around their little fingers. Both women conquer terrible adversity—and maybe the laws of physics—by charisma alone. These roles require men who can transform themselves from self-assured peacocks into enthralled fans: Jim Broadbent, of Moulin Rouge!, and Andrew Scott, who plays Moriarty on Sherlock. And they require women with a spare but irresistible magnetism: Sally Hawkins, from The Shape of Water, and Frances McDormand, from Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri.

Scott and McDormand’s pair founded mesmerism in the US. The mesmerist (Scott) was also a slaveholder; his clairvoyant stage partner (McDormand) worked in a textile factory. The slaveholder-mesmerist thought he could manipulate the worker. But instead he came to depend on her as his equal, his co-conspirator, and his private physician.

Hawkins and Broadbent’s pair made mesmerism nationally famous. A blind clairvoyant (Hawkins) claimed she could travel in spirit to New York. A pompous newspaper editor (Broadbent) was certain she was lying. But then they met. She won him over so completely that he published a book in her defense. Broadbent and Hawkins have worked with director Mike Leigh before, and in a dream world, he would take on the project. This movie crosses his period pieces with his dramas of the magic in ordinary relationships (like the unforgettable Happy Go Lucky).

In both of the two stories my book tells, the man starts out with the upper hand, then loses it, then forgets why he wanted it in the first place. How did Gleason and Brackett cast their spells? That's the question Credulity answers.
Learn more about Credulity at the University of Chicago Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Sam Peters's "From Darkest Skies"

Sam Peters is a mathematician, part-time gentle-person adventurer and occasional screenwriter who has seen faces glaze over at the words ‘science fiction’ once too often. His inspirations include Dennis Potter, Mary Doria Russell, Lynda La Plante, Neal Stephenson, and Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure. He has more hopes than regrets, more cats than children, watches a lot of violent contact sport and is an unrepentant closet goth.

Here Peters dreamcasts an adaptation of his new novel, From Darkest Skies:
From Darkest Skies was optioned by a London-based production company almost two years ago with a view to making it as a TV series. Now it’s true that this happens to a lot more books than actually make it all the way to the screen. I don’t know what the hit rate is – probably less than ten percent – and even for those that make it, the time between being optioned and hitting the screen can be many, many years (fifteen, I think, for Altered Carbon, which undoubtedly shares some DNA with From Darkest Skies). The point being for both authors and readers: don’t hold your breath! But the point also being that in this case, I’ve given quite a lot of thought to who I think would be great to play each of the major characters.

From Darkest Skies is a futuristic thriller centred around intelligence agent Keon Rause, native of a colony world whose original settlers were predominantly Pacific Islanders so I’d really like Keon to be played by someone who looks like they have some of that DNA in them. A strong noir element permeates the atmosphere, too. World-weary and grieving, I’m going for Matrix-era Keanu Reeves for this.

Although notionally trying to unravel the death of a minor celebrity from an apparent drug overdose, Keon’s real goal is to discover the truth about the death, five years ago, of his wife Alysha. To help him with this, Keon has recreated his wife as a simulation embedded in Artificial Intelligence, whom he calls Liss, and this is where the heart of the story lies, in the complex and difficult relationship between Keon and Liss as they discover both separately and together that Alysha wasn’t quite who everyone thought. Although Alysha doesn’t appear in the narrative, I imagine her appearing in flashback sequences in a TV adaptation and so I’m looking for someone who can play two versions of the same character, one a construct, one the real deal. Although I originally had Alysha down as being of Persian descent, I’m going to go with Zoie Palmer because of the superb job she does of playing a very similar dual role in SyFy’s Dark Matter.

When he’s not moonlighting looking for his wife’s killer, Keon routinely works with three other agents who complete the core ensemble. Laura is taciturn, clever, possibly a little unstable and utterly at home in the shadow-world of conspiracy into which Keon descends and I can’t think of anyone I’d rather see play her than Archie Panjabi, reprising a version of The Good Wife’s Kalinda Sharma. Esh was inspired by Agent Shaw from Person of Interest so Sarah Shahi, please. Bix Rangesh has the job of bringing some levity to the show so I’m going for Danny Pudi, who played Abed in Community.
Visit Sam Peters's website.

The Page 69 Test: From Darkest Skies.

--Marshal Zeringue

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Daniel Bessner's "Democracy in Exile"

Daniel Bessner is the Anne H.H. and Kenneth B. Pyle Assistant Professor in American Foreign Policy in the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies at the University of Washington.

Here Bessner dreamcasts an adaptation of his new book, Democracy in Exile: Hans Speier and the Rise of the Defense Intellectual:
Since Democracy in Exile was published, I’ve been thinking about what a filmed version of it would look like. After giving it some consideration, I’ve decided that, if my book were produced for the silver screen, I would prefer if each half were filmed in a different style. The book traces the career trajectory of Hans Speier, a German exile from National Socialism who in the United States became the founding chief of the RAND Corporation’s Social Science Division. The first part of Speier’s life covered in the book was characterized by movement: from Berlin to New York City; from New York to Washington, D.C.; and from Washington to Germany, and back again. The second half, in contrast, was defined by stability. A filmed version of Democracy in Exile would, I believe, have to take account of this difference, in the hopes that doing so would accurately portray the unexpected twists and turns of a life lived largely in exile.

Thus, the first chapter, which focuses on Speier’s disillusionment with Marxist theory and politics in the extreme conditions of the Weimar Republic, would have the feel of a 1920s expressionist film. The second and third chapters, which take place in 1930s New York and analyze Speier’s attempts to solve the riddle of Nazism, would look like a noir. The fourth chapter, which examines Speier’s time as a U.S. government propagandist during World War II, would feel like a war movie.

Filmed versions of the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth chapters, which elucidate Speier’s work for the RAND Corporation, U.S. government, and Ford Foundation, would differ from the book’s first half in that they would share a coherent filming style that would reflect Speier’s emergence as an influential figure in the Cold War-era national security state. In my opinion, these chapters would be filmed like other Cold War films, particularly The Shape of Water and A Beautiful Mind, the latter of which portrays an intellectual who did significant research at RAND.

Because the film would ideally amalgamate several different styles, a director like Michelle MacLaren, whose diverse work for Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, and other shows has displayed a wide-ranging talent, would be perfectly suited to the project.

Casting would center on finding someone capable of playing Speier. I think the best actor would be a German fluent in English able to convey a quiet intensity and determination. Christoph Waltz, of Inglourious Basterds fame, would be a good choice, as would Andreas Pietschmann, who was recently on the Netflix series Dark.

Regardless, what is certain is that a filmed version of Democracy in Exile would be an international hit that would no doubt sweep all the Oscar categories in which it was nominated, bringing its heretofore unheralded author into the much-deserved-spotlight.

Or not.
Visit Daniel Bessner's website.

The Page 99 Test: Democracy in Exile.

--Marshal Zeringue

Saturday, May 5, 2018

Joanne Rocklin's "Love, Penelope"

Joanne Rocklin's children’s books have garnered starred reviews, as well as awards, including The SCBWI Golden Kite, Parents’ Choice Gold Medal, Sydney Taylor Notable, ALA Notable, California Library Association Beatty Award, and others. They are also on many state lists.

Here Rocklin shares some insights about an adaptation of her new middle grade novel, Love, Penelope:
Love, Penelope is told in letters to an unborn sibling by a young girl who lives in Oakland with her two mamas.

It was inspired by the proximity in time of two major celebrations: the June 19, 2015 parade in Oakland (where I live) for the Golden State Warriors’ 2015 National Basketball Association championship; and the joy following the June 26, 2015 Supreme Court decision making same-sex marriage legal across the U.S.

Those two events are especially meaningful to my main character, who loves both the Warriors and her city. She also wishes her parents would marry. She has always felt angry when people call San Francisco The City, as if Oakland was not as important. So too, the “domestic partnership” of her mothers doesn’t carry the weight and honor of a marriage, in her mind.

I see these two events as the highpoint of any movie of my book, as they would emphasize Penny’s growth and acceptance and joy in her own identity.

I have no idea who could play Penny, or who would direct. However, the voice of Penny as read by the actress, Maia Kolosky, in my book trailer, is absolutely perfect.
Watch the Love Penelope video trailer, and visit Joanne Rocklin's website.

The Page 69 Test: Fleabrain Loves Franny.

Coffee with a Canine: Joanne Rocklin & Zoe.

--Marshal Zeringue